Tag Archives: Prince Fielder

I Do Not Believe Peter Gammons

9 Dec Prince Fielder

Well, actually, I do.

I am 100% faithful that what Peter Gammons says has occurred.

Gammons reported via twitter that the Cubs say “they do not have cash to sign (Prince) Fielder.” Those tricky Cubs aren’t telling the truth to poor Peter.

Unless the Cubs magically turned into a mid-market team, the Cubs can certainly afford to sign the free agent first baseman.

According to Cot’s Contracts and MLB Trade Rumors’ arbitration projections, the Cubs’ payroll stands at $87.1M at the start of free agency. Throw the David DeJesus signing in, and that brings the number up to $92.1M. Add in Ian Stewart’s arbitration raise, the payroll could jump up to a possible $95.1M. Add in a mixture of pre-arbitration players, and you could envision that number being pushed up to $96.6M.

An addition of a premium player of Fielder’s type would certainly cost the Cubs a small fortune, although not as much as one may think. Albert Pujols signed for $27.5M per year, so Fielder could conceivably sign for much less since he lacks the defensive prowess Pujols holds. Is $24M for seven or eight years feasible? Sure.

A $24M addition to the payroll boosts the figure up to $120M in 2012. That’s certainly a hefty figure, but considering the Cubs have maintained payrolls of $134,004,000, $144,359,000, and $134,809,000 the past three seasons, and it’s more than capable for the Cubs to sustain.

Also, when one considers that the albatross contract of Carlos Zambrano ends after the season, the Cubs would be able to afford $19M per year on a worthwhile player. Ryan Dempster’s $14M contract also ends after next season. Two years after his contract expires, Alfonso Soriano’s contract does the same.

If payroll is indeed tight, the Cubs would really have to swallow the bitter pill for just one season. And why not? The addition of Prince Fielder would certainly make the team much better, and would provide the Epstein Administration an impact addition to start their tenure off with.

With the potential free agent class of 2013 and beyond lacking a power bat, the Cubs may be pressured to make a move not only to improve the club now, but also in the future.

The Cubs’ Pursuit of Pujols and Fielder

29 Nov Albert Pujols

Ken Rosenthal has reported that the Cubs are actively pursuing free agent first basemen Albert Pujols and Prince Fielder. Rosenthal states that the free agent slugger is becoming a rare commodity in the coming years, and while the Cubs are not in any shape to contend, power-hitting first basemen are going to be hard to come by on the open market in the coming years. That said, could the pursuit of the power hitters be just a market tactic?

In terms of market competition for Pujols, only the FloridaMiami Marlins have shown interest in the free agent. The Marlins have actually made an offer to Pujols, but it is believed to be an offer that Pujols would only accept if he truly wanted to play in Miami. Nothing has been reported that he really wants to play in South Beach, so that leaves the St. Louis Cardinals as the only real suitor for Pujols.

Getting a team to bid against itself is a tall order for an agent to do, and the Cardinals know that the market for Pujols’ services is really just them.

Enter: Theo Epstein and Jed Hoyer.

The Cubs’ front office may be seeing this as an opportunity to drive the Cardinals’ payroll and consequently decrease flexibility in coming years. Adding a potential $25M contract to a team whose payroll last season crossed over $100M for the first time in franchise history would essentially make the franchise rely on its homegrown players much more.

The Cubs also know that Pujols is very valuable to St Louis outside the lines, as he pursues various career milestones. Keeping him in a Cardinal uniform is essential to a St. Louis, whose franchise face would shift to Yadier Molina, Matt Holliday, or Adam Wainwright–all very good players in their own respect, but none carry the superstar image like Pujols.

The Cubs’ interest in Fielder could also be a ruse, simply indicating that the Cubs are indeed serious in acquiring a first base slugger.

Whatever the plan, the Cubs have put themselves in a good position to better themselves, or to aggravate opponents.

Who’s On First?

14 Oct first-base

In preparation for an upcoming post, who do you think will be at first base next year?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.